Millumin column repeat3/28/2023 ![]() and Ben representing an actor on stage : this is important because Ben and the UFO don't have the same timing. But what's happening in a real live situation ?įor our example, let’s introduce an UFO : In Millumin, you will find the same concepts. 1 / The Core ProblemĬlassic editing softwares, such as PremierePro or FinalCut, use regular timelines with a « red cursor » representing the playhead. Well, let's switch to another case to explain all this. When the timelines are not synchronized, we can have smooth transitions. The only difference between the two timelines, is unchecking the Synchronized option. Now, launch the second part and when the « ghost » is on the screen, launch the next column. Start the first part, and at some point, go to next column. 5 / Playing Segments from the Dashboard.2 / Solution : use Asynchronous Timeline.Thanks for your solutions over the years. ![]() I also suspect that you can improve on it and I hope you do! For example, I'm not sure whether the "\I" in the STYLEREF in step 3 is correct. To update the table, I selected it and did an update (F9). I did most of the setup with Word displaying the field codes (Alt F9). (I stopped short of a solution for a step overflowing multiple pages.)ĥ. The second line sets the relative page number to 1 if this is a new page. The first line compares the current page number with the starting page of the step plus the relative page number and enters the text of the "sn" bookmark followed by "continued" if this is a new page. In the cell containing a new step number, insert the the following as field codes: Create a bookmark so that the current step can be assigned to it. Assign a unique style to the step numbers. (I always disable allowing a row to break over a page.)ġ. There are constraints, as you pointed out in the article, the biggest one being that this will only work in the first full row that overflows the page. This may require a rethinking of how your data is laid out on the page, but the benefit of not ending up with corrupted documents is well worth the time.Īllen, I too wanted this to work, so after a day or so of experimenting, I came up with a partial solution. It is a better solution to look at use multiple smaller tables or, better yet, to create documents that use tables very sparingly. (Not a single row, mind you, but a table with many, many rows.) Invariably those documents are headed for problems because Word doesn't do a great job on keeping such long tables stable. I've known people who have created documents that consist of tables spanning hundreds of pages. If you use Word's table feature to organize your data in the manner described, you run the risk of your documents being more subject to corruption than if you organize your data differently. There is a larger problem to be aware of, however. This, of course, is rather tedious and prone to problems if your pagination changes due to edits or layout modifications. That way you could manually type the information to be repeated into the first column on those subsequent pages. (You can repeat entire rows at the top of each page, but not repeat only selected columns in a row.) The workaround is to make sure that rows don't span pages, instead always starting at the top of each new page. ![]() The reason is that if a row spans multiple pages, there is no way to "start over" the contents of a column on subsequent pages while letting the other columns continue in a normal fashion. If Katie has a step that is very long, spanning several pages, she wants the step number from the first column to show up on each page so she always knows what step number she's on. The second column is information or user directions. Katie has a Word document that is basically a giant table. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |